Rk Team gp g a gpg s pim ppg ppo pp% ppga tsh pk% shg shga ga gaa sv sv% en
1 Babson 27 95 152 3.52 858 220 21 91 23.1 14 91 84.6 0 3 72 2.67 784 .916 3
2 Castleton 25 54 72 2.16 671 421 15 132 11.4 28 122 77.0 3 1 97 3.86 804 .892 4
3 Hobart 29 110 162 3.79 1118 407 22 127 17.3 18 125 85.6 8 2 61 2.09 696 .919 3
4 Johnson & Wales (RI) 25 53 71 2.12 617 465 13 101 12.9 23 117 80.3 3 0 100 3.95 864 .896 2
5 Mass.-Boston 28 103 156 3.68 1082 399 27 136 19.9 15 132 88.6 3 0 53 1.89 647 .924 5
6 New England Col. 26 92 155 3.54 966 408 16 100 16.0 14 108 87.0 5 3 52 1.97 734 .934 1
7 Norwich 31 102 154 3.29 971 212 32 135 23.7 15 91 83.5 0 1 51 1.62 690 .931 1
7 Skidmore 23 69 116 3.00 710 348 14 92 15.2 11 90 87.8 3 1 58 2.52 661 .919 1
7 Southern Me. 26 58 89 2.23 667 375 21 118 17.8 28 123 77.2 0 2 102 3.87 737 .878 1
7 Suffolk 25 68 101 2.72 763 422 17 97 17.5 21 128 83.6 4 1 86 3.44 774 .900 4
Rk Team gp g a gpg s pim ppg ppo pp% ppga tsh pk% shg shga ga gaa sv sv% en
1 Babson 18 67 106 3.72 597 160 14 66 21.2 9 63 85.7 0 3 50 2.73 497 .909 2
2 Castleton 18 38 53 2.11 489 299 13 107 12.1 18 89 79.8 2 1 76 4.24 589 .886 3
3 Hobart 16 64 97 4.00 668 215 8 74 10.8 12 74 83.8 5 1 37 2.29 375 .910 1
4 Johnson & Wales (RI) 17 35 46 2.06 406 334 10 67 14.9 14 79 82.3 1 0 69 4.00 592 .896 1
4 Mass.-Boston 18 72 108 4.00 682 286 19 85 22.4 9 85 89.4 2 0 33 1.82 414 .926 2
6 New England Col. 18 55 89 3.06 624 287 8 67 11.9 12 74 83.8 5 2 41 2.22 521 .927 1
7 Norwich 18 62 92 3.44 569 132 17 79 21.5 10 51 80.4 0 0 29 1.60 386 .930 1
7 Skidmore 15 46 75 3.07 423 172 11 61 18.0 7 59 88.1 2 0 36 2.39 447 .925 1
7 Southern Me. 18 38 58 2.11 465 284 14 81 17.3 17 83 79.5 0 2 70 3.86 522 .882 0
10 Suffolk 18 47 68 2.61 522 315 11 65 16.9 17 95 82.1 3 1 72 4.00 578 .889 3